IZA Discussion Paper No. 316
نویسندگان
چکیده
Rejecting Capital-Skill Complementarity at all Costs Any serious empirical study of factor substitutability has to allow the data to display complementarity as well as substitutability. The standard approach reflecting this idea is a translog specification – this is also the approach used by numerous studies analyzing the relative capital-skill complementarity hypothesis formulated by GRILICHES (1969). According to this hypothesis, the degree of substitutability between skilled labor and capital is lower than that for unskilled labor and capital. Yet, the results of empirical studies investigating this hypothesis are controversial. This paper offers a straightforward explanation: Using a translog approach reduces the issue of factor substitutability or complementarity to a question of cost shares. Our review of translog studies mentioned in HAMERMESH’s (1993) summary on the demand for heterogeneous labor demonstrates that this argument is empirically relevant – all these studies can be reconciled with each other on the basis of the cost-share argument. JEL Codes: C3, D2
منابع مشابه
IZA Discussion Paper No. 274
This Discussion Paper is issued within the framework of IZA's research area 7KHH:HOIDUH6WDWHH DQG/DERUU0DUNHWVAny opinions expressed here are those of the author(s) and not those of the institute. Research disseminated by IZA may include views on policy, but the institute itself takes no institutional policy positions. The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in Bonn is a local and virtual in...
متن کاملIZA Discussion Paper No. 241
This Discussion Paper is issued within the framework of IZA's research area ,QWHUQDWLRQDOL]DWLRQ RII /DERUU 0DUNHWVV DQGG (XURSHDQQ ,QWHJUDWLRQ Any opinions expressed here are those of the author(s) and not those of the institute. Research disseminated by IZA may include views on policy, but the institute itself takes no institutional policy positions. The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)...
متن کامل